• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Header Right

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Archives for June 2012

There are Still Tax Incentives to Buy Business Assets

June 27, 2012 by curcurucpa

Share This:

Background

When a business owner buys fixed assets such as machinery and equipment, the business owner cannot deduct the full cost of the asset immediately.  Instead, the business owner deducts the cost of the asset over a number of years through depreciation.  Most equipment purchased by small business owners is depreciated over 3 to 7 years.  A special deduction known as a Section 179 deduction exists that allows business owners to deduct in the year of purchase the cost of certain fixed assets.

Business owners are allowed to deduct up to $139,000 of the cost of eligible property acquired and placed in service during 2012. Eligible property is tangible personal property (e.g., equipment, machinery, computers, furniture) that is used more than 50% in a business.  However, if the business owner purchases more than $560,000 of such property, the Section 179 deduction is reduced dollar for dollar by the amount of assets purchased in excess of $560,000.

Example:  Joan buys $40,000 of furniture and $50,000 of equipment in her business.  Since the $90,000 total cost of these assets is less than $560,000, Joan is eligible to fully deduct the $90,000 purchase price.

Example 2:  John buys $400,000 of furniture and $200,000 of equipment in his business.  Since John’s total purchases of $600,000 exceed $560,000, his Section 179 deduction is reduced by the $40,000 excess of assets purchased over the maximum limit.  John may claim a Section 179 deduction of $99,000 ($139,000 maximum amount reduced by $40,000 of asset purchases over maximum limit).

Another important limitation on the Section 179 deduction is the taxable income limitation.  The Section 179 deduction cannot exceed the total amount of taxable income derived from the active conduct of ANY trade or business of the business owner or his/her spouse during the year.

Active business income includes:

  • Proprietorship income or loss
  • Partnership income or loss
  • S corporation income or loss
  • Wages
  • Certain gains from sales of business assets
  • Interest on working capital loans related to a business

Any Section 179 deduction limited because of inadequate taxable income can be carried forward indefinitely.

Example: Joan buys $40,000 of equipment in her proprietorship.  She has $15,000 income in her business before any Section 179 deduction.  Joan’s Section 179 deduction is limited to her taxable income of $15,000.  Her business will have no profit for the year since her taxable income was sheltered by her Section 179 deduction.  The disallowed Section 179 deduction of $25,000 will be carried forward to offset Joan’s future taxable income.

Example 2:  Same as above except Joan’s husband has $40,000 of wages from his job.  Active business income includes wages earned by a spouse.  The couple’s active business income is therefore $55,000 ($15,000 from Joan’s business and $40,000 from the spouse’s wages).  Joan can now deduct the full $40,000 of equipment purchases.

If the business owner operates through a LLC or S corporation, the taxable income limitation also applies at the entity level.

Example:  John operates his business through an S corporation, ABC Corp.  ABC Corp has $15,000 of taxable income.  ABC Corp buys $20,000 of qualifying property.  ABC Corp’s Section 179 deduction is limited to its taxable income of $15,000.  ABC Corp carries forward the excess $5,000 Section 179 deduction indefinitely.

For S corporations and LLCs, the active business income is increased by shareholder wages and guaranteed payments, respectively.

Example:  Same as above example except that ABC Corp paid John $10,000 in wages during the year.  The $10,000 of shareholder wages is added back to ABC Corp’s taxable income of $15,000.  ABC Corp’s active business income is now $25,000 and it can take the full Section 179 deduction of $20,000.

Of course John must have enough active business income on his personal return to utilize the Section 179 deduction.

Example:  On John’s personal return, the $25,000 of active business income from his S corporation flows through.  If John has a $10,000 loss from a separate business, his active business income is now $15,000 ($25,000 income from the S corporation less $10,000 loss from his separate business).  John’s Section 179 deduction is limited to his $15,000 active business income.  The remaining $10,000 of Section 179 will be carried forward by John.

What Type of Assets Don’t Qualify for Section 179?

Certain types of property are not eligible for Section 179 deduction.  These include:

  • Air conditioning and heating units
  • Property used to furnish lodging (with the exception of hotels and motels)
    • This prevents most taxpayers with residential rental property from claiming Section 179 deductions
  • Property used outside the U.S.
  • Property used by a tax exempt organization
  • Property used by governmental units
  • Property used by an estate or trust

What’s Changed Since 2011?

Before January 1, 2012, the maximum Section 179 deduction was $500,000 and this deduction was reduced dollar for dollar when property exceeding $2,000,000 was purchased during a year.  A special Section 179 deduction of $250,000 was allowed for certain purchases of real property.  The Section 179 deduction was therefore reduced from $500,000 to $139,000 in 2012.  The Section 179 deduction for certain real property purchases was eliminated at the end of 2011.  It is possible that Congress will retroactively reinstate the higher Section 179 deduction of $500,000.  But it remains to be seen.  Finally, unless Congress acts, the Section 179 deduction for 2013 will be $25,000.  A very substantial reduction.

For more information on how these rules apply in your situation, please give us a call.

Buzzkill Disclaimer: This post contains general tax information that may or may not apply in your specific tax situation. Please consult a tax professional before relying on any information contained in this post.

Any tax advice contained in the body of this post was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions. Any information contained in this post does not fall under the guidelines of IRS Circular 230.

 

 


Filed Under: Small Business Tax Tagged With: business assets, Curcuru & Associates, depreciation, farmington hills cpa, metro detroit, Sal Curcuru, Section 179, small business tax, tax planning, Vito Curcuru

Not Receiving a Proper Acknowledgment Can be Fatal to a Charitable Deduction

June 13, 2012 by curcurucpa

Share This:

Congress set strict rules on substantiating charitable deductions.  There is a recent tax court case that disallowed charitable deductions even though the taxpayers had proof of payment through canceled checks.  The purpose of this blog is to list the substantiation requirements for making cash contributions and to review the facts of this recent case.

How to Substantiate Chartiable Contributions of Cash

When making a cash contribution of $250 or less, all that is required is a bank record (e.g., canceled check) or written receipt from the charity showing the charity’s name, amount, and date of donation.

When making a cash contribution of more than $250, no deduction will be allowed unless the taxpayer receives a written contemporaneous acknowledgement from the charity.  The acknowledgment must include ALL of the following:

  • The name and address of the charity
  • The date of the contribution
  • The amount of cash contributed
  • Whether the charity provided the donor with any goods or services in exchange for the contribution; and, if so, a description and a good faith estimate of the value of the goods and/or services provided to the donor.

To be contemporary, the acknowledgement must be obtained by the taxpayer on or before the earlier of:

  • The date the donor files her tax return for the year the donation was made OR
  • The return’s extended due date.

The Court Case

In the Durden case, the Tax Court disallowed a taxpayer’s charitable contribution even though the taxpayer had canceled checks and a written acknowledgement from the charity.  The reason the contribution was disallowed was because the acknowledgement was insufficient.

On their 2007 tax return, the Durdens claimed a charitable deduction of $22,000 for contributions to their church.  The contributions were made by check.  The Durdens received a written acknowledgement from the church; however, the acknowledgement was not sufficient because it did not state whether the Durdens received any goods or services in exchange for the contribution.  In fact, they did not.  The church issued another written acknowledgment stating that the Durdens did not receive any goods or services in exchange for their contribution.  However, this second acknowledgment was insufficient because it was received by the Durdens after they filed their tax return that listed the charitable contribution (remember that the acknowledgment has to be received by the earlier of (1) when the return is filed or (2) the extended due date of the return).

Taxpayers must be sure that the acknowledgment they receive from the charity lists all of the items in the substantiation requirements above.  Even though the Durdens did not receive anything in exchange for their contribution, the Tax Court held that the written acknowledgment had to explicitly state that nothing was received in exchange for the contribution.

Also, don’t forget the timing requirement.  It is important not to file the tax return until you receive the written acknowledgment.

Example:  John donates $1,000 to his church in December 2012 and has a canceled check.  He files his tax return on January 18, 2013.  He receives a written acknowledgment from the church on January 31, 2013.  His charitable contribution will NOT be allowed because he didn’t have the written acknowledgment when he filed his tax return. 

These are very strict rules and can result in very unfair treatment.

Buzzkill Disclaimer: This post contains general tax information that may or may not apply in your specific tax situation. Please consult a tax professional before relying on any information contained in this post.

Any tax advice contained in the body of this post was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions. Any information contained in this post does not fall under the guidelines of IRS Circular 230.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: charitable acknowledgment, charitable contribution, charitable deduction, charity, Curcuru & Associates, farmington hills cpa, itemized deduction, metro detroit, Sal Curcuru, small business tax, tax planning, Vito Curcuru

Primary Sidebar

Search

Archive

  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008

Category

  • Best Business Practices
  • Business Tax
  • Estate Planning
  • Michigan Tax
  • Personal Tax
  • Restaurants
  • Small Business Tax
  • Uncategorized

Copyright © 2012 · http://curcurucpa.com/blog