Uncategorized

As the end of the year approaches, it is a good time to think of planning moves that will help lower your tax bill for this year and possibly the next.

Year-end planning for 2018 takes place against the backdrop of a new tax law — the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — that make major changes in the tax rules for individuals and businesses. For individuals, there are new, lower income tax rates, a substantially increased standard deduction, severely limited itemized deductions and no personal exemptions, an increased child tax credit, and a watered-down alternative minimum tax (AMT), among many other changes. For businesses, the corporate tax rate is cut to 21%, the corporate AMT is gone, there are new limits on business interest deductions, and significantly liberalized expensing and depreciation rules. And there’s a new deduction for non-corporate taxpayers with qualified business income from pass-through entities.

We have compiled a checklist of actions based on current tax rules that may help you save tax dollars if you act before year-end. Not all actions will apply in your particular situation, but you (or a family member) will likely benefit from many of them. We can narrow down the specific actions that you can take once we meet with you to tailor a particular plan. In the meantime, please review the following list and contact us at your earliest convenience so that we can advise you on which tax-saving moves to make:

Year-End Tax Planning Moves for Individuals

• Higher-income earners must be wary of the 3.8% surtax on certain unearned income. The surtax is 3.8% of the lesser of: (1) net investment income (NII), or (2) the excess of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) over a threshold amount ($250,000 for joint filers or surviving spouses, $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 in any other case). As year-end nears, a taxpayer’s approach to minimizing or eliminating the 3.8% surtax will depend on his estimated MAGI and NII for the year. Some taxpayers should consider ways to minimize (e.g., through deferral) additional NII for the balance of the year, others should try to see if they can reduce MAGI other than NII, and other individuals will need to consider ways to minimize both NII and other types of MAGI.
• The 0.9% additional Medicare tax also may require higher-income earners to take year-end actions. It applies to individuals for whom the sum of their wages received with respect to employment and their self-employment income is in excess of an unindexed threshold amount ($250,000 for joint filers, $125,000 for married couples filing separately, and $200,000 in any other case). Employers must withhold the additional Medicare tax from wages in excess of $200,000 regardless of filing status or other income. Self-employed persons must take it into account in figuring estimated tax. There could be situations where an employee may need to have more withheld toward the end of the year to cover the tax. For example, if an individual earns $200,000 from one employer during the first half of the year and a like amount from another employer during the balance of the year, he or she would owe the additional Medicare tax, but there would be no withholding by either employer for the additional Medicare tax since wages from each employer don’t exceed $200,000.
• Long-term capital gain from sales of assets held for over one year is taxed at 0%, 15% or 20%, depending on the taxpayer’s taxable income. The 0% rate generally applies to the excess of long-term capital gain over any short term capital loss to the extent that it, when added to regular taxable income, is not more than the “maximum zero rate amount” (e.g., $77,200 for a married couple). If the 0% rate applies to long-term capital gains you took earlier this year—for example, you are a joint filer who made a profit of $5,000 on the sale of stock bought in 2009, and other taxable income for 2018 is $70,000—then before year-end, try not to sell assets yielding a capital loss because the first $5,000 of such losses won’t yield a benefit this year. And if you hold long-term appreciated-in-value assets, consider selling enough of them to generate long-term capital gains sheltered by the 0% rate.
• Postpone income until 2019 and accelerate deductions into 2018 if doing so will enable you to claim larger deductions, credits, and other tax breaks for 2018 that are phased out over varying levels of adjusted gross income (AGI). These include deductible IRA contributions, child tax credits, higher education tax credits, and deductions for student loan interest. Postponing income also is desirable for those taxpayers who anticipate being in a lower tax bracket next year due to changed financial circumstances. Note, however, that in some cases, it may pay to actually accelerate income into 2018. For example, that may be the case where a person will have a more favorable filing status this year than next (e.g., head of household versus individual filing status), or expects to be in a higher tax bracket next year.
• If you believe a Roth IRA is better than a traditional IRA, consider converting traditional-IRA money invested in beaten-down stocks (or mutual funds) into a Roth IRA if eligible to do so. Keep in mind, however, that such a conversion will increase your AGI for 2018, and possibly reduce tax breaks geared to AGI (or modified AGI).
• It may be advantageous to try to arrange with your employer to defer, until early 2019, a bonus that may be coming your way. This could cut as well as defer your tax.
• Beginning in 2018, many taxpayers who claimed itemized deductions year after year will no longer be able to do so. That’s because the basic standard deduction has been increased (to $24,000 for joint filers, $12,000 for singles, $18,000 for heads of household, and $12,000 for marrieds filing separately), and many itemized deductions have been cut back or abolished. No more than $10,000 of state and local taxes may be deducted; miscellaneous itemized deductions (e.g., tax preparation fees) and unreimbursed employee expenses are no longer deductible; and personal casualty and theft losses are deductible only if they’re attributable to a federally declared disaster and only to the extent the $100-per-casualty and 10%-of-AGI limits are met. You can still itemize medical expenses to the extent they exceed 7.5% of your adjusted gross income, state and local taxes up to $10,000, your charitable contributions, plus interest deductions on a restricted amount of qualifying residence debt, but payments of those items won’t save taxes if they don’t cumulatively exceed the new, higher standard deduction.
• Some taxpayers may be able to work around the new reality by applying a “bunching strategy” to pull or push discretionary medical expenses and charitable contributions into the year where they will do some tax good. For example, if a taxpayer knows he or she will be able to itemize deductions this year but not next year, the taxpayer may be able to make two years’ worth of charitable contributions this year, instead of spreading out donations over 2018 and 2019.
• Consider using a credit card to pay deductible expenses before the end of the year. Doing so will increase your 2018 deductions even if you don’t pay your credit card bill until after the end of the year.
• If you expect to owe state and local income taxes when you file your return next year and you will be itemizing in 2018, consider asking your employer to increase withholding of state and local taxes (or pay estimated tax payments of state and local taxes) before year-end to pull the deduction of those taxes into 2018. But remember that state and local tax deductions are limited to $10,000 per year, so this strategy is not a good one if to the extent it causes your 2018 state and local tax payments to exceed $10,000.
• Take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from your IRA or 401(k) plan (or other employer-sponsored retirement plan). RMDs from IRAs must begin by April 1 of the year following the year you reach age 70-½. (That start date also applies to company plans, but non-5% company owners who continue working may defer RMDs until April 1 following the year they retire.) Failure to take a required withdrawal can result in a penalty of 50% of the amount of the RMD not withdrawn. Thus, if you turn age 70-½ in 2018, you can delay the first required distribution to 2019, but if you do, you will have to take a double distribution in 2019-the amount required for 2018 plus the amount required for 2019. Think twice before delaying 2018 distributions to 2019, as bunching income into 2019 might push you into a higher tax bracket or have a detrimental impact on various income tax deductions that are reduced at higher income levels. However, it could be beneficial to take both distributions in 2019 if you will be in a substantially lower bracket that year.
• If you are age 70-½ or older by the end of 2018, have traditional IRAs, and particularly if you can’t itemize your deductions, consider making 2018 charitable donations via qualified charitable distributions from your IRAs. Such distributions are made directly to charities from your IRAs, and the amount of the contribution is neither included in your gross income nor deductible on Schedule A, Form 1040. But the amount of the qualified charitable distribution reduces the amount of your required minimum distribution, resulting in tax savings.
• If you were younger than age 70-½ at the end of 2018, you anticipate that in the year that you turn 70-½ and/or in later years you will not itemize your deductions, and you don’t have any traditional IRAs, establish and contribute as much as you can to one or more traditional IRAs in 2018. If the immediately previous sentence applies to you, except that you already have one or more traditional IRAs, make maximum contributions to one or more traditional IRAs in 2018. Then, when you reach age 70-½, do the steps in the immediately preceding bullet point. Doing all of this will allow you to, in effect, convert nondeductible charitable contributions that you make in the year you turn 70-½ and later years, into deductible-in-2018 IRA contributions and reductions of gross income from age 70-½ and later year distributions from the IRAs.
• Take an eligible rollover distribution from a qualified retirement plan before the end of 2018 if you are facing a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax and having your employer increase your withholding is unavailable or won’t sufficiently address the problem. Income tax will be withheld from the distribution and will be applied toward the taxes owed for 2018. You can then timely roll over the gross amount of the distribution, i.e., the net amount you received plus the amount of withheld tax, to a traditional IRA. No part of the distribution will be includible in income for 2018, but the withheld tax will be applied pro rata over the full 2018 tax year to reduce previous underpayments of estimated tax.
• Consider increasing the amount you set aside for next year in your employer’s health flexible spending account (FSA) if you set aside too little for this year.
• If you become eligible in December of 2018 to make health savings account (HSA) contributions, you can make a full year’s worth of deductible HSA contributions for 2018.
• Make gifts sheltered by the annual gift tax exclusion before the end of the year and thereby save gift and estate taxes. The exclusion applies to gifts of up to $15,000 made in 2018 to each of an unlimited number of individuals. You can’t carry over unused exclusions from one year to the next. Such transfers may save family income taxes where income-earning property is given to family members in lower income tax brackets who are not subject to the kiddie tax.
• If you were in an area affected by Hurricane Florence or any other federally declared disaster area, and you suffered uninsured or unreimbursed disaster-related losses, keep in mind you can choose to claim them on either the return for the year the loss occurred (in this instance, the 2018 return normally filed next year), or the return for the prior year (2017).
• If you were in an area affected by Hurricane Florence or any other federally declared disaster area, you may want to settle an insurance or damage claim in 2018 in order to maximize your casualty loss deduction this year.

Year-End Tax-Planning Moves for Businesses & Business Owners

For tax years beginning after 2017, taxpayers other than corporations may be entitled to a deduction of up to 20% of their qualified business income. For 2018, if taxable income exceeds $315,000 for a married couple filing jointly, or $157,500 for all other taxpayers, the deduction may be limited based on whether the taxpayer is engaged in a service-type trade or business (such as law, accounting, health, or consulting), the amount of W-2 wages paid by the trade or business, and/or the unadjusted basis of qualified property (such as machinery and equipment) held by the trade or business. The limitations are phased in for joint filers with taxable income between $315,000 and $415,000 and for all other taxpayers with taxable income between $157,500 and $207,500.

• Taxpayers may be able to achieve significant savings by deferring income or accelerating deductions so as to come under the dollar thresholds (or be subject to a smaller phaseout of the deduction) for 2018. Depending on their business model, taxpayers also may be able increase the new deduction by increasing W-2 wages before year-end. The rules are quite complex, so don’t make a move in this area without consulting your tax adviser.
• More “small businesses” are able to use the cash (as opposed to accrual) method of accounting in 2018 and later years than were allowed to do so in earlier years. To qualify as a “small business” a taxpayer must, among other things, satisfy a gross receipts test. Effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, the gross-receipts test is satisfied if, during a three-year testing period, average annual gross receipts don’t exceed $25 million (the dollar amount used to be $5 million). Cash method taxpayers may find it a lot easier to shift income, for example by holding off billings till next year or by accelerating expenses, for example, paying bills early or by making certain prepayments.
• Businesses should consider making expenditures that qualify for the liberalized business property expensing option. For tax years beginning in 2018, the expensing limit is $1,000,000, and the investment ceiling limit is $2,500,000. Expensing is generally available for most depreciable property (other than buildings), and off-the-shelf computer software. For property placed in service in tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, expensing also is available for qualified improvement property (generally, any interior improvement to a building’s interior, but not for enlargement of a building, elevators or escalators, or the internal structural framework), for roofs, and for HVAC, fire protection, alarm, and security systems. The generous dollar ceilings that apply this year mean that many small and medium sized businesses that make timely purchases will be able to currently deduct most if not all their outlays for machinery and equipment. What’s more, the expensing deduction is not prorated for the time that the asset is in service during the year. The fact that the expensing deduction may be claimed in full (if you are otherwise eligible to take it) regardless of how long the property is held during the year can be a potent tool for year-end tax planning. Thus, property acquired and placed in service in the last days of 2018, rather than at the beginning of 2019, can result in a full expensing deduction for 2018.
• Businesses also can claim a 100% bonus first year depreciation deduction for machinery and equipment—bought used (with some exceptions) or new—if purchased and placed in service this year. The 100% writeoff is permitted without any proration based on the length of time that an asset is in service during the tax year. As a result, the 100% bonus first-year writeoff is available even if qualifying assets are in service for only a few days in 2018.
• Businesses may be able to take advantage of the de minimis safe harbor election (also known as the book-tax conformity election) to expense the costs of lower-cost assets and materials and supplies, assuming the costs don’t have to be capitalized under the Code Sec. 263A uniform capitalization (UNICAP) rules. To qualify for the election, the cost of a unit of property can’t exceed $5,000 if the taxpayer has an applicable financial statement (AFS; e.g., a certified audited financial statement along with an independent CPA’s report). If there’s no AFS, the cost of a unit of property can’t exceed $2,500. Where the UNICAP rules aren’t an issue, consider purchasing such qualifying items before the end of 2018.
• A corporation (other than a “large” corporation) that anticipates a small net operating loss (NOL) for 2018 (and substantial net income in 2019) may find it worthwhile to accelerate just enough of its 2019 income (or to defer just enough of its 2018 deductions) to create a small amount of net income for 2018. This will permit the corporation to base its 2019 estimated tax installments on the relatively small amount of income shown on its 2018 return, rather than having to pay estimated taxes based on 100% of its much larger 2019 taxable income.
• To reduce 2018 taxable income, consider deferring a debt-cancellation event until 2019.
• To reduce 2018 taxable income, consider disposing of a passive activity in 2018 if doing so will allow you to deduct suspended passive activity losses.

These are just some of the year-end steps that can be taken to save taxes. Again, by contacting us, we can tailor a particular plan that will work best for you.

Sooner or later, you may decide to sell property you inherited from a parent or other loved one. Whether the property is an investment, an antique, land, or something else, the sale may result in a taxable gain or loss. But how that gain or loss is calculated may surprise you.

Your Basis

When you sell property you purchased, you generally figure gain or loss by comparing the amount you receive in the sale transaction with your cost basis (as adjusted for certain items, such as depreciation). Inherited property is treated differently. Instead of cost, your basis in inherited property is generally its fair market value on the date of death (or an alternate valuation date elected by the estate’s executor, generally six months after the date of death).

These basis rules can greatly simplify matters, since old cost information can be difficult, if not impossible, to track down. Perhaps even more important, the ability to substitute a “stepped up” basis for the property’s cost can save you federal income taxes. Why? Because any increase in the property’s value that occurred before the date of death won’t be subject to capital gains tax.

For example: Assume your Uncle Harold left you stock he bought in 1986 for $5,000. At the time of his death, the shares were worth $45,000, and you recently sold them for $48,000. Your basis for purposes of calculating your capital gain is stepped up to $45,000. Because of the step-up, your capital gain on the sale is just $3,000 ($48,000 sale proceeds less $45,000 basis). The $40,000 increase in the value of the shares during your Uncle Harold’s lifetime is not subject to capital gains tax.

What happens if a property’s value on the date of death is less than its original purchase price? Instead of a step-up in basis, the basis must be lowered to the date-of-death value.

Holding Period

Capital gains resulting from the disposition of inherited property automatically qualify for long-term capital gain treatment, regardless of how long you or the decedent owned the property. This presents a potential income tax advantage, since long-term capital gain is taxed at a lower rate than short-term capital gain.

Be cautious if you inherited property from someone who died in 2010 since, depending on the situation, different tax basis rules might apply.

When an employer provides a company vehicle to an employee, the employee must generally include the market value of her personal use of the vehicle in her income.  The employer can generally take a payroll deduction for the actual costs, including depreciation, of providing the vehicle to the employee.

If the personal use of the vehicle is de minimis (of such small value that accounting for it would be impractical), the employee will not have to include the value of her personal use in income.  However, personal use of more than one day per month is not considered de minimis, so this exception is of little value.

Determining How Much to Include in the Employee’s Income

Under the general valuation rule, the value of the company vehicle that is included in the employee’s income is what it would cost the employee to lease a comparable vehicle for the same period the vehicle is available to her.  Generally, a cents-per-mile value cannot be used unless a comparable vehicle is available for lease to the employee on a cents-per-mile basis.

There are also three special valuation rules (each having different requirements).

• The Annual Lease Value Method
• The Commuting Value Method
• The Cents-per-Mile Method

The Annual Lease Value Method (ALV)

The ALV is based on IRS tables and is based on the market value of the vehicle on the first date it is available to the employee.  The vehicle’s purchase price can be used as the market value if the vehicle was purchased in an arm’s length transaction.  If the employer leases the vehicle, the employer can use the MSRP plus sales tax less 8% of this sum as the market value.

Example: ABC Corp leases a Ford Focus.  The MSRP for the car is $23,000.  After sales tax, the cost is $24,380.  ABC Corp can reduce this sum by 8% to determine a market value of $22,429 to look up in the ALV tables.  Based on the ALV tables, the employee will have to include $6,100 as income for her personal use of the car with a market value of $22,429.

The ALV includes maintenance and insurance, but does not include gas.  If the employer pays for gas, the value of the gas will have to be included in income in addition to the ALV amount.

The Commuting Value Method

This method may be used if four requirements are met:

• The auto must be owned or leased by the employer and provided to the employee to use in the employer’s business
• The employer requires, because of business reasons, the employee to commute in the vehicle (e.g., the employee is on 24 hour call)
• The employer must have a written policy that forbids the employee (or certain family members) from using the vehicle for personal reasons other than commuting or de minimis personal use
• The employee required to use the vehicle must not be a controlling owner of the employer

If these requirements are met, the personal use value of the company car will be $3 per round trip ($1.50 per one way commute).

The Cents-Per-Mile Method

This method may be limited because it cannot be used when the value of the vehicle when it first becomes available to the employee exceeds $15,600 for a passenger vehicle and $17,600 for a truck or van.  In addition, this rule may be used only for vehicles that are expected to be used in the employer’s business throughout the year, or for vehicles that are actually driven at least 10,000 miles in that year and used primarily for business by employees.  If the vehicle qualifies under this method, the standard mileage rate (54.5 cents in 2018) may be used to determine the personal use value of the vehicle.

Requirements of All Special Use Valuation Methods

To use any of the three special valuation rules, one of the following conditions must exist:

• The employer treats the value of the vehicle as wages for reporting purposes before the extended due date of its tax return for the year the benefit is provided
• The employee includes the value of the benefit in income before the extended due date of her tax return for the year the benefit is provided
• The employee is not in control of the employer
• The employer demonstrates a good faith effort to treat the benefit correctly

Payroll Tax Implications

The employer must report and withhold income and employment taxes on the value of personal use of a company car.  However, there are two elections available to the employer:

• The employer can elect to treat the personal use value as paid at any time during the year.  Thus, the employer can treat the entire personal use value as being provided on December 31 of each year to delay the due dates of the income withholding and payroll taxes
• An employer can elect not to withholding income taxes (the employee will have to pay income tax estimates on her own).  However, the employer is still responsible for employment taxes.

Comments or questions about this post?  Please let us know through the comment area below!

If you found this article informative, subscribe to our Tax Newsletter.

Buzzkill Disclaimer:  This post contains general tax information that may or may not apply in your specific tax situation. Please consult a tax professional before relying on any information contained in this post.

The recently enacted tax reform law made some significant changes to the system of income tax deductions used by consumers. Here are highlights of the changes.

The standard deduction is increased.

For the 2018 tax year, the standard deduction has grown to as much as $24,000. Because of the significant increases, many taxpayers who formerly itemized their deductions may now benefit from the standard deduction instead.

Changes in Standard Deductions

These 2018 standard deduction amounts will be indexed for inflation after 2018. The additional standard deduction for the elderly and the blind is unchanged.

The deduction for state and local taxes is reduced.

For those who itemize their deductions, the maximum amount permitted for all state and local taxes (SALT) combined is $10,000 per year ($5,000 for married individuals filing separately). How the new limit affects you will depend on your specific situation. If you live in a high-tax state, you may see much of your SALT deduction reduced, and that could mean that itemizing deductions is no longer the better option.

The mortgage interest deduction has a lower cap.

For mortgage debt incurred after December 15, 2017, you may only deduct interest on debt value up to $750,000 ($375,000 for married individuals filing separately). Previously, the limit was $1 million. For home equity debt, the deduction for interest is suspended through 2025, unless the proceeds are used to buy, build, or substantially improve the home that secures the loan.

Casualty and theft losses are not now generally deductible.

Beginning this year, only losses that occur as the result of a federally-declared disaster may be deducted. Formerly, casualty and theft losses had generally been deductible to the extent they exceeded 10% of adjusted gross income (AGI).

Miscellaneous itemized deductions are suspended.

Various miscellaneous expenses, such as unreimbursed employee business expenses and tax preparation expenses, were formerly deductible as an itemized deduction to the extent they totaled more than 2% of the taxpayer’s AGI. The new law suspends the deduction for these expenses.

Charitable contributions are still deductible if you itemize.

Cash contributions will now be allowed up to 60% of the taxpayer’s “contribution base,” up from 50%. A taxpayer’s contribution base is generally equal to AGI exclusive of any net operating loss carryback for the year. This change will affect only those taxpayers who contribute a significant proportion of their income to charity.

Medical expense rules become more generous.

Taxpayers with substantial medical expenses who also itemize can now deduct unreimbursed medical expenses in excess of 7.5% of their AGI, down from the deductibility threshold of 10% previously. Note that the reduced threshold was made retroactive to January 1, 2017, but will apply only for 2017 and 2018.

Moving expenses lose their tax advantage.

The deduction for qualified moving expenses, which can be claimed even if a taxpayer doesn’t itemize, has been suspended, except for members of the Armed Forces on active duty (provided certain conditions are met).

The alimony deduction for payers is eliminated.

The tax treatment of alimony payments will change significantly under the new law. Such payments will no longer deductible by the payer (and the recipient will no longer be required to include the alimony in income). The change applies to alimony paid under any divorce or separation agreement executed after December 31, 2018.

Note that some of these provisions are scheduled to sunset in 2019 or 2026 unless Congress acts to extend them. Talk to your tax advisor to see how the law may ultimately impact your situation.

Source/Disclaimer:

This communication is not intended to be tax advice and should not be treated as such. Each individual’s tax circumstances are different. You should contact your tax professional to discuss your personal situation.

In many cases, shopping online comes with a major perk—online purchases are not subject to sales tax.  While online purchases are not subject to sales tax, they are generally subject to use tax.  Use tax is not charged by the online seller, but shoppers in many states are required to report purchases subject to use tax on their personal tax returns and pay the use tax liability along with filing their state tax returns.  As you can guess, compliance with this requirement is very low.

States are obviously not happy because they are not able to collect sales tax from online retailers and because online buyers are not reporting their purchases that are subject to use tax.  It’s estimated that online sales surpassed $409 billion last year and according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, states lose between $8 billion and $33 billion every year.

The reason states are not able to collect sales tax from many online retailers is because a retailer must have a physical presence in the state before the retailer is subject to the sales tax collection requirement.  The Supreme Court in two older cases held that the Constitution requires a physical presence before a business can be subject to a state’s sales tax jurisdiction.  Physical presence could include a retail location, warehouse, employees, or delivery vans in a state.

In-state retailers are also not happy because online retailers are effectively able to sell their products at a discount because no sales tax is imposed.

The Times Are a Changin’

In 2016, South Dakota declared a fiscal emergency based on its inability to collect sales tax from remote sellers.  To combat this, South Dakota passed a law that requires out-of-state sellers to collect and remit sales tax as if they had a physical presence in the state.  The statute applies to retailers that (1) deliver more than $100,000 of goods or services (yes, South Dakota imposes a sales tax on services) into the state or (2) engage in 200 or more transactions for delivery of goods or services into the state.

South Dakota was challenging the physical presence requirement for sales tax.  The case was recently decided in the Supreme Court of the U.S.  In South Dakota vs. Wayfair, Inc. the Supreme Court sided with South Dakota, ruling that the physical presence requirement is outdated.  Given advances in technology, a business may be present in a state in a meaningful way without being physically present in that state.

Example:  Before Amazon.com opened a warehouse in Michigan it was not subject to sales tax in Michigan because it had no physical presence.  Regardless of how powerful a presence it had in Michigan through its website it was not subject to sales tax liability in Michigan.  However, a small retail shop located in Michigan would be subject to sales tax liability.  Should a small retail shop be subject to sales tax even though Amazon.com has a much stronger presence in the state (albeit not a physical presence).

 In the wake of Wayfair, the following items have to be kept in mind:

• States will likely change their sales tax laws to remove the physical presence requirement. Business owners selling into states where they do not have a physical presence should determine what the sales tax requirements are in those states to determine if they have a filing requirement.  As states will update their laws in the coming months and years, regular reviews of state filing requirements should be conducted.
• States still are not free to do whatever they want. The Court in Wayfair pointed out that South Dakota’s statute has several features that pass muster under the Constitution.  First, the law does not apply to businesses that do not meet the $100,000 sales threshold or the 200 transaction threshold.  Also, South Dakota is a member of the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement, which reduces administrative costs by providing state-funded sales tax software.  States that impose laws that do not have similar safeguards may find their laws invalid.