• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Header Right

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

working condition fringe benefit

Getting Schooled—Providing Employee Educational Assistance

August 3, 2012 by curcurucpa

Share This:

There are two primary methods for business owners to provide tax-free educational assistance to themselves and to their employees.  The methods are:

  • Working Condition Fringe Benefit
  • Section 127 Plan

Working Condition Fringe Benefit

Educational expenses paid under this method are deductible by the employer and are tax free to the employee.  The educational expenses are also excluded from payroll taxes such as FICA and FUTA.  There is no limit on the amount of educational expenses that qualify; however, the educational expenses must be ordinary and necessary business expenses.

To qualify as a working condition fringe benefit, the educational program must relate to maintaining or improving the skills required by the employee’s job.  The education itself must NOT lead to the student qualifying for a new trade or business.  Education required to meet the minimum skill level required for the job does NOT qualify.  Job related education may be furnished directly by the employer or through a third party such as an educational institution or seminar organization.  The educational expenses of the business owner also qualify.

Example:  ABC Corp employees Joan as an engineer.  Joan is climbing the corporate ladder and believes an MBA will help her develop management skills to help her advance her career.  ABC Corp pays for her MBA.  Since the MBA will improve her skills, the educational expenses paid by ABC Corp will not be taxable to her.  In addition, ABC Corp can take a deduction for the educational expenses.

Example 2: John is a law student working in a law firm as a legal assistant.  The law firm offers to pay John’s law school tuition.  These expenses will NOT qualify as a working condition fringe benefit because the law degree is required for John to meet the minimum requirements for his job as an attorney.  However, the tuition may qualify for exclusion as a Section 127 plan.

Section 127 Plan

A Section 127 plan is a qualified education assistance program.  The first $5,250 of qualified educational assistance provided during the year is exempt from tax, including FICA and FUTA.

To qualify under Section 127, a plan is required.  The plan must:

  • Be in writing
  • Provide educational assistance exclusively to employees (possibly including owners)
  • Not provide employees with a choice of education assistance and taxable compensation
  • Provide reasonable notice of the availability and terms of the program
  • Not discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees or their dependents
  • Not pay more than 5% of the benefits to more-than-5% owners or their spouses or dependents

Children of owners can participate in a Section 127 plan if they are at least 21 years of age, are legitimate employees, are not more than 5% owners, and are not dependents of the owner.  Children under age 21 can still participate in Section 127 plans, but their educational expenses are subject to the nondiscrimination rules (which could disqualify the plan).

Example:  ABC Corp is owned by John.  ABC Corp has three employees—Adam (John’s son) and two unrelated employees.  All employees are 22 years old.  John does not claim Adam as a dependent.  ABC Corp pays $5,000 towards each employee’s tuition.  Since Adam is at least 21 years old, is a legitimate employee, is not a dependent, and is not a more-than-5% owner, the tuition paid on his behalf is not counted as being for a highly compensated employee or a more than 5% owner.  All employees may exclude the $5,000 tuition payment from their incomes.

Example 2:  Same facts as above except that Adam (John’s son) is 20 years old.  Since Adam is under age 21, he is attributed ownership from his father (i.e., Adam is considered a 100% owner).  Since 33% of the benefits ($5,000 tuition for Adam divided by $15,000 total tuition paid) are paid for a more-than-5% owner, EACH employee must report the $5,000 tuition payment as income.

Key Difference between a Working Condition Fringe Benefit and Section 127 Plans:

  • A $5,250 cap applies to Section 127 Plans, but not working condition fringe benefits
    • If over $5,250 is spent on educational expenses under a Section 127 plan, the excess may qualify as a working condition fringe benefit
  • The cost of travel, meals, and lodging may qualify as a working condition fringe benefit but not under a Section 127 plan
  • The working condition fringe benefit is not subject to nondiscrimination rules
  • The limitation on expenses that qualify a student for a new job or to meet minimum eligibility requirements will not qualify as a working condition fringe benefit, but may qualify under a Section 127 plan.

These rules are fairly complex.  If you need help navigating through these rules, give us a call and we’ll be happy to help.

 

If you found this article informative, subscribe to our Tax Newsletter.

 

 Buzzkill Disclaimer:  This post contains general tax information that may or may not apply in your specific tax situation. Please consult a tax professional before relying on any information contained in this post.

Any tax advice contained in the body of this post was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions. Any information contained in this post does not fall under the guidelines of IRS Circular 230

Filed Under: Small Business Tax Tagged With: birmingham cpa, Curcuru & Associates, education deductions, employer provided education, farmington hills cpa, fringe benefits, metro detroit, qualified education assistance program, Sal Curcuru, Section 127, section 132, small business tax, tax planning, tuition reimbursement, Vito Curcuru, working condition fringe benefit

Primary Sidebar

Search

Archive

  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008

Category

  • Best Business Practices
  • Business Tax
  • Estate Planning
  • Michigan Tax
  • Personal Tax
  • Restaurants
  • Small Business Tax
  • Uncategorized

Copyright © 2012 · http://curcurucpa.com/blog